Search for: "STATE v. COLORADO" Results 4541 - 4560 of 4,900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
It is well established that commercially sold food falls under a strict products liability scheme.11 What varies from state to state, however, is which entities are strictly liable. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:11 am
The Colorado Appelate Court, reviewing all of the circumstances involving email correspondence, affirmed the validity of the email as a "written denial".A Washington case, Lake v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Sept. 17, 2008), the United States District Court of Colorado held the presumptive lead plaintiff adequate to represent the class because its “contracts for difference” (“CFD) were “securities” under the Securities Exchange Act. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:33 pm
It is well established that commercially sold food falls under a strict products liability scheme.11 What varies from state to state, however, is which entities are strictly liable. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
Most states do not allow the elimination of fiduciary duties (although my home state of Colorado does). [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
Colorado Department of Corrections: inmate sues after falling during an escape attempt; claims state failed to make jail "reasonably escape-proof" Lincoln v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:17 am
(He had apparently successfully fought extradition from Colorado.) [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
The historical range of the species in the contiguous states encompassed the northeastern states, including New York and Pennsylvania, the Great Lakes states, the Rocky Mountains, including Montana, Idaho, Oregon, Utah, and Colorado, and the Cascade Range of Washington and Oregon. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
Ken Salazar, a former state attorney general and chief legal counsel to former Colorado Gov. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" Vice Chancellor Donald Parsons, Jr.: "Delaware decisions like Caremark and Stone v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]