Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 4541 - 4560 of 6,087
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2011, 8:22 am
Justice Sotomayor suggested to him that the Fifth Circuit’s “incidental” damages test set forth in Alison v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:11 am by Thomas Econometrics
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:53 am by Sarah Johnson Phillips
Knowing how to properly draft and negotiate PPAs will not only alleviate tension between buyer and seller, but will protect your client by equitably allocating future risks that can arise in this ever-changing business and legal environment. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm by Steven G. Pearl
" Deniston also correctly notes that plaintiffs' counsel Joseph Sellers faced "tough questioning from Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, Ginsburg was a bit worried about how, if the class action did proceed, a federal judge could handle the issue of sorting out who among them received an award of back pay, and Kagan and Sotomayor appeared troubled about how the judge would handle individual hearings into the job harms allegedly done to specific… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:12 am by Lyle Denniston
In order for the case that has come to be known widely as Dukes v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:34 pm
This reasoning behind this was first expressed by our Supreme Court in the case of Escola v Coca Cola Bottling Co over fifty years ago. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
Sellers of the Washington, D.C., office of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Chris's discussion begins with a summary of New York law concerning marketability discount that I prepared for a post several months ago featuring the Cole v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Spencer: resell data: if you’re comfortable with a first party seller using the data, why not allow resale? [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:45 am
What they fail to realize is that the costs associated with the rate are as important as the term, type of rate (e.g., fixed v. adjustable) and the loan program (e.g., FHA, conventional, jumbo). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:14 am by Mike Scarcella
The plaintiffs’ lawyers, led by Joseph Sellers of Washington's Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, has asked for an 8% cut, or $60.8 million, for the work performed in Keepseagle v. [read post]