Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 8,517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2014, 2:38 pm
Floor space is not of itself a determinative factor and small rooms should not be precluded from being a bedroom unless they have physical features or drawbacks that prevent them from being used as a bedroom by any of the people listed in regulation B13(5) and (6) (i.e. a child, an overnight carer or an adult). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
Should people have been disturbed? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The court’s decision in Bush v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
So if a doctor said it was necessary then it was...Now, the First District Court of Appeals for California has agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to the IMR process.A date and time for the oral argument in Stevens v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:43 pm
As young people continue to grow up, bullying may be a precursor to violence in dating. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:37 am
Another highlight is the keynote speaker, Mary Beth Tinker, a plaintiff from the landmark students’ rights case Tinker v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
The dispute concerns a photograph Kenna took of a small island in Gangwon Province under the title of “Island of Pine Trees. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:06 pm
First, in Small v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:11 am
Integrity Staffing Solutions v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:11 am
Integrity Staffing Solutions v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 1:27 pm
(See People v King). [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:59 am
She said she believed the harassment would continue without a permanent order and had heard that Murcia said “he was not sweating the small stuff. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
United Tactical Systems v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 11:52 pm
In November of this year, the Sixth Circuit decided a case called Hyland v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 5:38 pm
In People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:21 pm
Here, he has a thoughtful article on Why Innocent People Plead Guilty. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
App. 2003); Gorman v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:08 pm
Is a defendant who makes six separate telephone calls urging a relative to persuade the prosecution’s chief witness not to testify at trial entitled, under People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:14 am
The test was phrased well by Justice Brandeis in Kellogg v National Biscuit: "...the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer". [read post]
