Search for: "State v. Downes" Results 4541 - 4560 of 36,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
I had chills down my spine when I read this opinion. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
Dixon, 976 So. 2d 1206, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); ordering a driver in a stopped vehicle to roll down his window, Greider v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
   The Supreme Court unanimously upheld a federal law requiring TikTok’s Chinese owners to sell or shut down the social-media app by Jan. 19, siding with Congress’s national-security concerns over the platform and its users’ claim that the ban violates the First Amendment. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:49 am
Law Review Article About Westbrook v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
This way, eligibility for federal benefits would not differ from state to state. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 8:27 am
An interesting decision was handed down recently by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York with respect to class action lawsuits involving wage claims under both Federal and State law.In Guzman v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:51 am by Eugene Volokh
The Department is already defending the constitutionality of DOMA in Gill v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm
In that decision, all nine judges voted to strike down the Separate but Equal standard, allowing state-sponsored segregation, that had existed since the Plessy v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
The main opinion in this case references Troxel v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:40 am by Harry Styron
The contract for deed stated that the purchase price was $30,000, to be paid with $3,000 down and 144 monthly payments of $300. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:01 am by Genevieve Nadeau
While the case raises the specific question of whether state courts may use state constitutional provisions to strike down regulations of congressional elections imposed by the legislature, the Court could answer the question more broadly to remove additional state-level checks on legislatures under the Elections Clause (with potential implications for the Electors Clause as well). [read post]