Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 4541 - 4560 of 9,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2016, 1:27 pm by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
In the federal system, imposition of a sentence within the guidelines range was mandatory until the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Abbott, where the Court affirmed a three-judge district court’s rejection of the claim that Texas violated the “one-person, one-vote” principle by equalizing the number of people—rather than the number of voting-age citizens—in each district.Second, notwithstanding the importance of the “one-person, one-vote” doctrinal revolution in the 1960s—the first time the Court said the Constitution requires… [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:29 am by Patrick Quinlan
  Here are just two examples of Justice Scalia as Judicial Activist: Bush v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:10 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also granted the agency’s motion to strike those portions of the employer’s briefing and its counsel’s affidavit that revealed some of what was said or done during the conciliation process (EEOC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee dismissed plaintiffs’ claims as time-barred. [read post]
” Supreme Court Opinion In April of 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court’s judgment, ruling that an approved JD was “final agency action” subject to judicial review. [read post]
29 May 2016, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
The decision letter addressed the Mohammed criteria (R v Camden LBC exp Mohammed (1997) 30 HLR 315). [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:22 am by Stephen Wermiel
She has made it a personal crusade to oppose the large sums of campaign money being raised and spent in state judicial elections. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
Legislation is being considered in 27 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
25 May 2016, 2:44 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
On appeal, the First District Appellate Court upheld the judgment, stating that JAP could not prove or measure how it suffered harm from these actions. [read post]
25 May 2016, 2:44 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
On appeal, the First District Appellate Court upheld the judgment, stating that JAP could not prove or measure how it suffered harm from these actions. [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:05 pm by Kelly Buchanan
Under Law No. 1,079, crimes against the Federal Constitution and crimes of responsibility that have been practiced or attempted by the President of the Republic, Ministers of State, Justices of the Federal Supreme Court, and the Attorney General (Procurador Geral da República) are punishable with loss of office and disqualification from the exercise of public functions for five years. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
First, its cursory discussion of the standards of judicial review is incomplete and could be misleading if misapplied in other cases. [read post]
24 May 2016, 9:00 am by Steve Vladeck
At its core, and in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]