Search for: "U.S. Marshals" Results 4541 - 4560 of 6,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
On November 20, 2007, Dienst sent an email to Henkels expressing “amazement and candidly some concern about the recent transaction whereby CIBC divested CIBC World Markets Corp. in the U.S. to Oppenheimer,” and requested “[Henkels's] and Oppenheimer’s assurances that [Henkels] will be there to see this deal across the finish line. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm by David Golove
Professor Kent points, in particular, to a number of Marshall Court opinions which he reads as affirming Congress’ constitutional power to disregard international law. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:43 am by Susan I. Nelson
” However, as Marshall Fitz of the Center for American Progress points out, “the president can’t ‘legalize’ undocumented immigrants. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:11 pm by Jenny Martinez
by Jenny Martinez It is a pleasure to hold International Law in the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:56 am by David Ingram
He spent two years as an assistant to the U.S. solicitor general, and he’s a former clerk to the late Justice Thurgood Marshall and to retired Judge Patricia Wald of the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:04 am by Andrew Kent
I think a different or at least supplemental story can be told about why U.S. courts were so actively involved in prize litigation. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:46 am by Harlan Cohen
The personality and experience of individual justices, hinted at in portraits of Justice Sutherland or references to international roles played by Jay, Marshall, Taft, Hughes, and Jackson, recede into the background. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am by John Day
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v.Iqbal, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Lyle Denniston
Marshall, docket 10-179), declaring that a U.S. bankruptcy court did not have the authority to decide her claim, since it was based on state law only. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:47 am
The Bottom Line: The e-ink is barely dry on the commentators' articles and blog postings about the Supreme Court's jurisdiction-affecting decision last month in Stern v Marshall, 10-179, 56 U.S. --, 2011 U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:47 am
The Bottom Line: The e-ink is barely dry on the commentators' articles and blog postings about the Supreme Court's jurisdiction-affecting decision last month in Stern v Marshall, 10-179, 56 U.S. --, 2011 U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:37 pm by Doug Isenberg
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division to issue an injunction against Adobe to prevent further damages. [read post]