Search for: "USA V. IN" Results 4541 - 4560 of 11,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2011, 4:21 pm
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (CS) broker Eric Butler is permanently barred from future violations of securities laws. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am by Amy Howe
” In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews Wednesday’s oral argument in Young v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm by WIMS
      On October 11, 2007, DVL initiated this action against defendants-appellees Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, National Grid USA, National Grid, and National Grid USA Service Company, Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Intellectual Property 'Miss Asia USA' Mark Does Not Infringe, Blur 'Miss USA' Beauty Pageant Trademark Miss Universe L.P. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 7:03 am by Ellena Erskine
ShareThe court will hear oral arguments this morning in Hewitt v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:52 am by Ellena Erskine
Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC and U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 7:32 am by Ellena Erskine
Reynolds Vapor Co. and McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The petition also fails to adequately allege that ACS violated the Family Medical Leave Act, as petitioner did not assert that he had worked for ACS for 12 months or 1,250 hours, and thus failed to demonstrate that he was an eligible employee under 29 USC § 2611(2)(A)(ii) (see Donahue v Asia TV USA Ltd., 208 F Supp 3d 505, 512 [SD NY 2016]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The petition also fails to adequately allege that ACS violated the Family Medical Leave Act, as petitioner did not assert that he had worked for ACS for 12 months or 1,250 hours, and thus failed to demonstrate that he was an eligible employee under 29 USC § 2611(2)(A)(ii) (see Donahue v Asia TV USA Ltd., 208 F Supp 3d 505, 512 [SD NY 2016]). [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The media and the public are hyper-focused on the impact of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement on whether Roe v. [read post]