Search for: "United States v. District Court"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 34,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am
Plaintiff was also granted leave to file an amended complaint setting out a RLUIPA claim.In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
Davis of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has set up a clash between judges in that district over whether Virginia recognizes the “independent personal stake” exception to the intra-corporate immunity or intra-corporate conspiracy doctrine. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court held earlier this year in Spokeo v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:24 pm
For example, the government prevailed in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 1:44 am
Judge Alan Albright of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas has denied the first of several post-trial motions with which Intel is challenging the record $2.175B verdict. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
The Indiana Supreme Court has issued its decision in Town of Avon v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:17 pm
Thus, the District Court for the Southern District of New York followed the decision of Jewel v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:41 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:34 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 11:36 am
Export-Import Bank of the United States, No. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
The United Stated District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held invalid the product configuration mark shown immediately below, for beach towels, finding the circular shape to be functional. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:41 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:50 am
The Court then discussed the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Tanner v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:27 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 3:33 am
Gandhi had "never manufactured or marketed sesame oil products under the IDHAYAM brand in the United States or anywhere" (ECF No. 7-1 at 5), and Mr. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:34 am
” Indeed, the Arizona District Court limited its analysis to the phrase “actual charges” in Pierce v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:15 pm
Qui tam relators may have a difficult time in the future when relying upon stolen records or confidential patient information in False Claims Act (“FCA”) whistleblower actions after a recent decent by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 3:56 am
” The claims were brought under §1983 of the United States Constitution and Connecticut common law and statutory law. [read post]
