Search for: "United States v. Was"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 102,819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 6:23 pm
United States/Boeing v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 8:07 am
United States applies retroactively to collateral cases challenging federal sentences enhanced under the residual clause in United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:41 pm
Audio of oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 4:30 am
" Harris v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:28 am
In Ambrioso v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 1999, 11:00 pm
Since its enactment in 1972, Title IX of the Education Amendments had gone mostly undefined by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Apr 1999, 11:00 pm
Since its enactment in 1972, Title IX of the Education Amendments had gone mostly undefined by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:17 pm
On Monday, March 1, 2010, the United States Supreme Court granted Wayne County prosecutors’ petition for a writ of certiorari in Michigan v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:33 pm
Prather, 69 M.J. 338 (C.A.A.F. 2011) and United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:38 am
The recent opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maine in Watts v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:19 am
In 1981 the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Michigan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 12:35 pm
Referring to United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:43 am
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) stated on Monday that the State of Palestine filed an application to intervene in South Africa v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 6:53 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:36 am
This is the first published California decision addressing the issue since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 am
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) in Weisfelner v. [read post]