Search for: "Waites v. State"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 12,155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Dujmovic-Terman v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Dujmovic-Terman v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am
Alaska Oil & Gas Assn. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:08 am
An unhappy party could file a state complaint wait for the results and then file a due process hearing over the same dispute. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:23 am
On a hunch, the officer rolled down his window and yelled: “Hey guys, wait a minute. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 5:46 pm
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:34 am
Wichita State University, October 20, 2016, Marten, J.). [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 5:25 am
It was only in 2003 that the United States Supreme Court struck a fatal blow to sodomy laws, in the landmark Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:51 pm
The best indication of the joint dissent’s misunderstanding of the Framers’ scheme is its treatment of Justice Story’s landmark 1820 opinion in a piracy case, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:14 pm
But what I don't understand here is why wouldn't waiting for a natural birth be the alternative to a c-section? [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:15 am
Stay motion Judge Spath moves on to the defense’s “motion to abate pending the resolution of the United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 4:49 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen previews Endrew F. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:10 pm
Cenlar FSB v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
In the case of R (Ingenious Media) v HMRC ([2016] UKSC 54) UK Supreme Court held that information provided by taxpayers to HMRC is confidential and that HMRC acted unlawfully by disclosing such information to journalists. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 10:25 am
Don’t wait. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:45 am
They’re waiting. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 3:19 pm
” Wait, what? [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 12:44 pm
Yeo, supra; Butler v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:18 pm
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Apple v. [read post]
