Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 6,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2010, 7:14 am
Do we let people doMurder Is Excusable, But Being Gay.... posted by Orin Kerr at The Volokh Conspiracy - (Orin Kerr) From a BBC story about a Saudi Prince, now living in London, who murdered his servant after having a sexual affair with him: If he ever returns to his home country he faces the possibility of e...Average Homicide Cost Is $17.25M, Study Concludes"posted by CrimProf BlogEditor at CrimProf Blog - FindLaw has this story from Iowa State University. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 10:03 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently learned that a book has been published about me. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm
Orin Kerr puzzles over Justice Sotomayor's "rather remarkable dissent from denial of certiorari in Pitre v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:33 pm
(Orin Kerr) From a BBC story about a Saudi Prince, now living in London, who murdered his servant after having a sexual affair with him: If he ever returns to his home country he faces the possibility of execution — not because of the murder, but because being gay is a capital offence in Saudi Arabia. [read post]
ORIN KERR: Justice Sotomayor Votes to Review and then Reverse Pro Se Prisoner Case Lower Courts Fou…
19 Oct 2010, 11:06 am
ORIN KERR: Justice Sotomayor Votes to Review and then Reverse Pro Se Prisoner Case Lower Courts Found “Patently Frivolous. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am
Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy looks at the “rather remarkable” dissent in more depth, while Sentencing Law & Policy Blog highlights a notable snippet. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:37 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today Justice Sotomayor authored what strikes me as a rather remarkable dissent from denial of certiorari in Pitre v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:18 pm
(Orin Kerr) I appreciate Jonathan Adler’s response on the nature of Randy Barnett’s proposed act/omission distinction on the scope of federal power. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:18 pm
(Orin Kerr) C-Span’s archives are truly amazing, and its online library has filled out over time. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:14 am
(Orin Kerr) The Supreme Court may answer that question in Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:21 am
(Orin Kerr) Today the Supreme Court granted cert in Ashcroft v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:13 pm
The article includes a discussion of York University's Marcus Boon's book on copying (available for free download) and Ian Kerr's exceptional article on digital locks in From "Radical Extremism" to "Balanced Copyright": Canadian Copyright and the Digital Agenda. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 9:13 pm
(Orin Kerr) I very much appreciate Randy’s response to my latest post; It’s really terrific to have this discussion with him. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:05 pm
(Orin Kerr) It is always a pleasure when Randy responds to one of my posts that touches on his areas of expertise. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:23 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently was reminded of this quote about Commerce Clause doctrine and I thought I would put it out there for comment in light of the recent debates on the constitutionality of the individual mandate: [T]he Court as an institution and the legal system as a whole have an immense stake in the stability of our Commerce Clause jurisprudence as it has evolved to this point. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 11:32 am
(Orin Kerr) The more I participate in discussions on the constitutionality of the indivdiual mandate, the more it feels to me like a replay of last year’s discussions on the Privileges or Immunities Clause on the road to McDonald v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:58 pm
(Orin Kerr) My law school friend Allison Leotta, a federal prosecutor who specializes in sex crimes, is blogging about each episode of Law & Order: SVU to explain what in each episode was realistic and what was not. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:12 pm
(Orin Kerr) Congratulations to Randy Barnett in particular for the new Florida decision refusing to dismiss the challenge to the individual mandate. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:42 pm
UPDATE: Orin Kerr asks why Judge Vinson didn’t seriously address the federal government’s Necessary and Proper Clause argument, other than to say that the relevant precedents don’t cover the issues raised by this case. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
Kerr noted playfully: "Counsel for the defendant, a Mr. [read post]
