Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 4561 - 4580 of 15,464
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The Conversation has a post about this “Government funding for journalism: To what end? [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am by familoo
Surveillance 'includes monitoring, observing or listening to persons, their movements, conversations or other activities and communications.' It's 'covert' if it is carried out in 'a manner calculated to ensure that any persons who are subject to the surveillance are unaware that it is or may be taking place'. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 7:26 am
Conversely, Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law) and Nontando Tusi (ReCreate policy fellow) argue that the fair use provisions are balanced and will permit uses necessary for further creativity. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals orders a new trial for two people accused of marriage fraud because the trial judge had an ex parte conversation with the jurors and may have compromised the integrity of the jury process by undermining the presumption of innocence.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 4:11 am by Diane Tweedlie
Hedtke's letter was further evidence of confidentiality of said meeting and thus of the question whether document D2 was public or not at the priority date and, as a consequence, whether the content of document D2 or part of it formed state of the art or not.In a communication dated 1 October 2013 the examining division gave a brief summary of the telephone conversation of 26 July 2013. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:21 pm by Lev Sugarman
Peter Margulies examined the Supreme Court decision in Nielsen v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm by Jessica Smith
One argument made in the national conversation about overcriminalization is that too many minor activities are made criminal and that it’s not efficient, effective, or fair to address this activity through the criminal justice system. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Joy Waltemath
His defamation claim also failed, because it was based on internal documents protected by conditional privilege (Cyr v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia ABC reports that South Australian Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young might be cross-examined about her sexual history during a defamation trial against former senator David Leyonhjelm Canada In the case of Lotin v Gregor 2019 ONSC 1510 it was held that defamatory statements made one of the defendants accusing the plaintiff of stealing money in a telephone conversation and a text message and awarded damages of Can$2,000. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:27 am by davidferriero
This year’s celebration of information access began with an event on Monday, March 11, where I was fortunate to host a special one-on-one conversation with Beryl A. [read post]