Search for: "COOPER v. STATE" Results 4561 - 4580 of 7,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2012, 11:38 am by mpeters
       According to the complaint in Kickflip Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Cooper, which held that sovereign immunity barred Congress’s attempt to hold states accountable for copyright infringement. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:31 am by Lesley (Program Coordinator)
In Canada and elsewhere, freedom of speech is on the endangered listJohn Cooper Balancing a journalist’s right to do their job against the demands of justice can be challenging. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:33 pm by Patricia Salkin
Sullins v Central Arkansas Water, 2015 Ark. 29 (Ark. 1/29/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/arkansas/supreme-court/2015/cv-14-581.html Filed under: Current Caselaw, Exactions Tagged: Interlocal agreement [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:04 pm by Mary Mock
  The U.S. government filed a civil-forfeiture action in which the named defendants were the objects themselves: The United States of America v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
While in the Voting Section, she received the high honor of being invited by the United States Solicitor General to sit at counsel table during the Supreme Court argument in Reno v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:13 pm
 By contrast, Land O’Lakes is owned by 7,000 dairy farmers and 1,200 community cooperatives. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
Roy Cooper’s veto of that state’s new “ag-gag” law with, ironically, Cooper being named as the main defendant. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The purposes of this privilege are to further the truth-seeking process at trial and encourage cooperation of witnesses, particularly with regard to expert witnesses, so that they can discharge their public duty freely “with knowledge that they will be insulated from the harassment and financial hazard of subsequent litigation” (Tolisano v Texon, 144 AD2d 267, 271 [1988, Smith, J., dissenting], revd for reasons stated in dissent 75 NY2d 732… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:36 am by Matthew Nelson
Recent transcripts reveal that 7th Circuit Magistrate Judge Nan Nolan has urged the parties in Kleen Products, LLC, et. al. v. [read post]