Search for: "Deter v. Deter"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 5,291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2009, 10:23 am
"Having brought an action against a major media company for defamation and having been threatened with an "Anti-SLAPP" counterclaim (SLAPP = "strategic litigation against public participation") (a very empty threat under the circumstances), I note with interest that the Minnesota Supreme Court has just heard argument (10/8/09, video available here) in Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed District v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
In Central Bank of Denver v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 10:36 am
In the case, Tichinin v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:47 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:31 pm
The Court of Appeal's opinion is Clark v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:19 pm
Insurers may not directly discriminate against the sick, but can find other ways to keep high-risk patients out of their plans, as even the most market-oriented health policy experts realize: [T]o avoid patients with costly, complicated medical conditions, health plans could include in their networks relatively few doctors who specialize in treating those conditions, said Mark V. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:45 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the case of Markovic v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
See, e.g., Linn v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 7:09 am
It was an NOL pill, in fact, that became the subject of controversy in Selectica v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:54 am
They’re wearing out their shoes on 99% of the cases to make it more likely they will catch — or deter — the 1% that represents a genuine threat. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:23 pm
App. 4th 669); political campaign statements (Conroy v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:53 am
It was an NOL pill, in fact, that became the subject of controversy in Selectica v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
With that in mind, we turn to San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 10:44 pm
Clement v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 11:08 am
According to that case, Williams v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:59 am
Philip v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:02 pm
— Boring v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Investigations and the Taylor lawCity of New York v DeCosta, 95 NY2d 2731. [read post]
