Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General" Results 4561 - 4580 of 20,992
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
§ 546, provides that “the Attorney General may appoint a United States attorney for the district in which the office of United States attorney is vacant,” so long as the person appointed by the AG is not someone whom the President has tried to appoint as U.S. attorney but whom the Senate has “refused” to confirm, and so long as the AG’s appointment does not last more than “120 days. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm
  As the opinion notes, the Orange County District Attorney -- the District Attorney -- showed up to argue the case below. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:02 pm by Brian M. Wright
This does not necessarily mean that there is a higher prevalence of an injury or medical condition arising from your type of employment than there is in the general labor market overall, just that some distinctive aspect of your job led to the exposure/overexertion. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This is an attorney v. attorney case in which it is alleged that defendants withdrew from defending plaintiff in a disciplinary action and then engaged in a campaign to sully his name. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Regrettably, however, the USCIS Memorandum does not address the opposite situation, i.e., where the employer pays the required wage to an H-1B worker who is on an approved medical leave, even though payment is not required by the benefits plan or by statute. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Regrettably, however, the USCIS Memorandum does not address the opposite situation, i.e., where the employer pays the required wage to an H-1B worker who is on an approved medical leave, even though payment is not required by the benefits plan or by statute. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:16 pm by Josh Blackman
Here, the attorney general determined that DACA had "constitutional defects," in light of the Fifth Circuit's decision in Texas v. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 1:48 pm by Andrew Appel
Penny Venetis, attorney for the Gusciora plaintiffs, filed a motion (in early May) with the Court, to make the State abandon its plans for online voting, on the basis that receiving ballots e-mailed or uploaded on the Internet clearly violates this order. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by David Post
  (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the Attorney General may appoint a United States attorney for the district in which the office of United States attorney is vacant. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 4:30 pm by Josh Blackman
Because the relevant actors are the DHS Secretary and the Attorney General. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Roberts explains that Secretary Duke was "bound by the Attorney General's legal determination" concerning Texas v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:52 pm by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
The Court stated: Whether DACA is illegal is, of course, a legal determination, and therefore a question for the Attorney General. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:12 pm by Peter Margulies
This principle, first announced by the Supreme Court in 1943's SEC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:46 am by Ilya Somin
She instead treated the Attorney General's conclusion regarding the illegality of benefits as sufficient to rescind both benefits and forbearance, without explanation…. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:14 am by Jonathan Holbrook
He would have held that North Carolina does have a good faith exception, pursuant to the 2011 amendment to G.S. 15A-974, which provides legislative authority for the exception that was lacking when State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 7:56 am by Jonathan H. Adler
According to Roberts, Acting DHS Secretary Duke was bound by the Attorney General's conclusion that DACA was unlawful, but was nonetheless obligated to consider various approaches to DACA's purported illegality and whether ending DACA would disturb settled expectations. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Karim Benyekhlef and Nicolas Vermeys
In numerous cases, business solutions were simply tweaked, which implies some limitations since the legal system does not operate like the business world. [read post]