Search for: "Does 1 - 75"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 4,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2009, 4:19 pm
” The House version is H.R. 1, as passed on January 28, 2009, with a 244 to 188 vote margin. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 6:03 pm
" Does she have the only set of keys to the justices' washroom? [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:48 am
In particularly time-sensitive cases, the Court does sometimes set a shorter schedule. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 8:57 am
An important point discussed at the Workshop is that it does not matter why the Justices want to build larger coalitions. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 9:29 pm
(Alas, the decision does not address how Fuiaxis had standing to seek dissolution after his withdrawal, or how the 25%-75% alignment created deadlock.)Some months after Fuiaxis brought suit, the three other members approved a resolution requiring all members including Fuiaxis to contribute $10,000 each to be used as an advance to the LLC for its legal expenses in defending against the dissolution action and to… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 3:43 pm
See Rusher, 966 F.2d at 874-75. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
Any document that does not have one of the key terms is ignored. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:20 am
The Senate confirmed Holder on Monday evening by a vote of 75 to 21. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
" The LLC in Fisk was governed by a 5-member board requiring 75% approval for all management decisions. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 9:57 am
Why does the Jacksonville DUI suspect fail the test with a score of 75? [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:03 am
., decided 1/29/2009) The New York Court of Appeals' April 2005 decision in Rekemeyer v State Farm Mut. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
" Thus, Rule 4(m) explicitly: (1) is wholly self-enabling, does not reference Rule 6(b) and is not dependent upon it; (2) is triggered if and when the time already has expired without service, i.e., must not be invoked prior to expiration of the time; and (3) always is subject to the Court acting sua sponte. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
LEXIS 8315, *1 (D. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:34 pm
Historically they used a 1 for 1 policy. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 2:43 am
This does not however detract from the fact that the PM is first among equals in what is known as the "cabinet government. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
., No. 08-349, certiorari denied 1/12/09. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:19 am
To be eligible, an employee would need to: (1) have been employed at least 12 months; (2) worked at least 1250 hours in the 12-month period preceding leave commencement; and (3) work at a work site where there are at least 50 employees within 75 miles. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 9:35 pm
Penman, 75 F.3d 1311, 1326 (9th Cir. 1996)). [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:25 am
Most importantly, the central claim is simply false, as you say in your post: the law does not replace or eliminate elections. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
It does not grant an injured covered service member leave from work to due to their own serious injury or illness. [read post]
