Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
Like its English counterpart, the Judge considered that the Scottish common law right should be interpreted and developed in ways which reflect the values underlying ECHR rights [113-114, 126]. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:36 pm
Raja TransportIndian Oil Corporation v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
R. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:55 pm
The arguments to the contrary required torturing not only constitutional law but the English language. [read post]
8 May 2010, 6:52 am
Firma Deco Line and Mietz v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am
See Rosalind English’s post on the report findings here. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:09 pm
Today, I discuss the seminal California Supreme Court premises liability case of Rowland v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
In such cases, the principle has been accepted that an English court might be obliged to refuse to co-operate with a non-contracting state if to do so would be a “flagrant breach of Article 6”. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:27 pm
Maybe something you'd see in a really fractious university English Department or something. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm
Although the Court in Day v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:14 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:56 am
This question arose before the England & Wales High Court in Barthelemy v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
In Xcentric Ventures LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
Hale's proposition was relatively uncontroversial throughout the Commonwealth for several centuries, although several English judges did express some reservations about it over the years; for instance, in R v Clarence (1889) 22 QBD 23. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
Hale's proposition was relatively uncontroversial throughout the Commonwealth for several centuries, although several English judges did express some reservations about it over the years; for instance, in R v Clarence (1889) 22 QBD 23. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:25 pm
Bassett v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
In Xcentric Ventures LLC v. [read post]
