Search for: "GRANT v. STATE"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 61,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2008, 3:29 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
In Tien v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 1:03 pm
What I want to point to in this post is a passage from United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:29 am
It has to be granted by the court. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:29 am
It has to be granted by the court. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
” (Dissent op. at 2) (citing United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:45 am
Facts: This case, (United States of America v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 10:44 am
” In August, the Supreme Court granted leave to proceed in the application challenging the Regulations, and asked the Attorney General to advise the State on provisions that may require changing. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Nevada v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 10:20 pm
” United States ex rel Williams v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:09 am
Joyce Yeager won in State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
Dec. 21, 2018) (granting motion to dismiss common law trespass claim because State lacked exclusive possession over the land). [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:22 pm
" See United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:23 am
On November 4, 2015, the Washington County Board of Zoning Appeals (“the Board”) granted the application. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:47 am
Administrative law — Due process — Notice and opportunity to be heard This appeal asks us to determine whether the Maryland Board of Public Works (the “Board”) erred when it granted a tidal wetlands license to the Maryland Port Administration (“MPA”), a Maryland State agency, for the proposed Phase III expansion of the Paul S. ... [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
The Court did grant cert. in the survivor benefits case Astrue v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:38 pm
As written, though, it would again allow states to outlaw abortion, a rare instance that the high court would rescind a constitutional right that it granted. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:24 pm
Bureau of Indian Affairs (Freedom of Information Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlLavallie v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 3:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
