Search for: "GROW v. GROW"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 11,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm
X of the State Constitution “Medical cannabis” means 108 all parts of any plant of the genus Cannabis, whether growing or 109 not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the 110 plant; and every compound, manufacture, sale, derivative, 111 mixture, or preparation of the plant or its seeds or resin that 112 is dispensed only from a dispensing organization for medical use 113 by an eligible patient as defined in s. 499.0295. 114 … [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm
X of the State Constitution “Medical cannabis” means 108 all parts of any plant of the genus Cannabis, whether growing or 109 not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the 110 plant; and every compound, manufacture, sale, derivative, 111 mixture, or preparation of the plant or its seeds or resin that 112 is dispensed only from a dispensing organization for medical use 113 by an eligible patient as defined in s. 499.0295. 114 … [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
That is the doctrine of Marbury v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:20 am
This lawsuit reminds me a little of the growing number of lawsuits against Apple for injuries caused by texting while driving. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm
Employer and other health plan sponsors, fiduciaries and insurers generally should be prepared to prove that they are maintaining and administering their health plans to comply with many Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandates pending Congressional repeal or reform of the ACA, despite President Trump’s January 20, 2017 Executive Order on “Minimizing the Economic Burden of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Pending Repeal” (Executive Order) because the… [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 9:02 am
That is, essentially, the conclusion of the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 9:02 am
That is, essentially, the conclusion of the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:12 am
Tuesday morning’s argument in Midland Funding v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am
In 1943 and 1944, he was an instructor in aeriel navigation and physical education for Naval Officers enrolled at UVA under the V-12 program. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:19 am
Torres v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 4:09 am
The position had not been altered by the decision of the Supreme Court in A v British Broadcasting Corporation [2014] UKSC 25. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Tensions in the North in 2012 have led to the commission of serious crimes (euphemistically referred to as ‘les évènements’), of which many have gone unpunished. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 8:40 am
Putting aside presidential politics, cybersecurity threats are growing and increased regulation, enforcement and litigation exposure is likely. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
A narrowly-tailored geographically limited injunction can be particularly damaging to growing businesses if the business is forced to accept trademark confusion in the event of future expansion. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm
The position had not been altered by the decision of the Supreme Court in A v British Broadcasting Corporation [2014] UKSC 25 (“A v BBC”). [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 3:53 am
ESG – particularly sustainability & climate change – continues to grow in importance. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 1:56 pm
In that case, Cross v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:20 am
Admittedly, the Supreme Court ruled that such sweeping congressional power was permissible in its badly flawed decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
