Search for: "Husband v. Wife" Results 4561 - 4580 of 6,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 7:58 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In a monumental Opinion handed down on April 30, 2010, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled in D'Adamo v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:25 am
Carrington (NFP) - "A finding that property was inherited, without more, is insufficient to justify an unequal division of the marital estate. * * * Here, the reasons stated by the trial court to justify setting off a portion of Wife's inheritance to her without an equal distribution to Husband are that the asset was inherited solely by wife, was never co-mingled with Husband's or joint assets, and was never added to or managed by Husband.… [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:27 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
The victim’s husband later testified his wife was “emphatic” in always wearing her seat belt. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 3:53 am
"  Despite the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act requiring a broad interpretation of its terms to protect victims, the trial court dissolved the wife's TRO against the husband, finding that the husband lacked a purpose to harass despite admitting to everything that she alleged. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:01 am by Hillary A. Frommer
 However, it found that the movant’s proof in that regard was deficient because there was no evidence that the requirements for a valid marriage under the Domestic Relations Law were complied with; to wit, that the petitioner and decedent solemnly declared that they take each other as husband and wife, or that the Imam who performed the ceremony had the religious authority to do so. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 1:17 am
Attorney General of the United States "Sun Wen Chen and Wen Hui Gao, husband and wife, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that reversed the immigration judge's (IJ) grant of asylum and withholding of removal. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 8:51 am
Accordingly, the court gave directions for the husband's notice to show cause why an order should not be made in the terms of the agreement to be determined at the next hearing. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 11:15 am by Jeff Marshall
The cash that is converted to income is recouped with interest over time as annuity payments are made to the community spouse.My law partner, Matt Parker, was the attorney on the case, James v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 1:07 pm
LEXIS 18695, 1996 WL 727396, at *5 (police responding to a 911 call about a husband refusing to give a wife her car keys with no report of violence did not qualify as exigent circumstances such that the police could enter). [read post]