Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: S. M., A CHILD"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 5,730
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2010, 5:46 am
JG: Okay, interesting. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:14 pm
Thus, the court held that the surrogacy agreement was invalid and unenforceable as a matter of public policy, and that the child’s legal parents were the surrogate mother and the genetic father, giving the surrogate mother the right of visitation after concluding that it was in the best interest of the child to live with its genetic father and his wife. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:10 pm
Various SORNA updates are available on NCSL's Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 4:02 am
The client was clearly not comfortable in his clothes and it was attracting the attention of the jury.Kysa M. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Hallevy's interesting article on this point.The difficulty with that principle, however, is that it generally applies where there are two or more parties involved in the commission of the criminal act - but I'm not aware of any authority applying it to the case of a single perpetrator who is simultaneously the victim. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:05 pm
It's a slick app. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:26 am
That's interesting. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 2:41 am
Payments can be backdated to the 'effective date', i.e. the date that liability commenced, which is usually the date that the Child Support Agency informs the non-resident parent about the application for child support.dividends subject to child maintenanceShare dividends are ignored when calculating child maintenance, but may be taken into account as a variation - see here.husband's mistress has monies left in willYou will not be able to… [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 7:22 am
That's interesting. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:08 am
Zelda kept trying to shut him down, as his stories were more interesting than hers, and he would feign being a scolded child whenever Zelda gave him the evil eye. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:01 am
When digital literacy/access is so important, one child’s mistake shouldn’t get a family kicked off the internet. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:06 pm
Metalitz: I’m not negotiating this agreement. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 10:28 pm
Harriet Harman’s Fine, or Does this look right? [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:54 am
" False: The child's preference where he or she wants to live my play a small part in a custody determination, but by-and-large children are not allowed to choose where they want to live until they turn 18. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:19 pm
" As a further argument, the Court emphasised inter alia that the change in the child's circumstances resulted from a wrongful removal. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
It's interesting. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:34 am
Basically, FIN 46 said there are no orphans: every child has one and only one father. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:52 pm
Do take your significant other to the firm’s Christmas party. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
I'm leaving it on the January 8 list for those interested in the briefs, but with the understanding that of course it will not be granted at conference tomorrow. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 9:27 am
And if it’s of public interest, it will usually make it into the press. [read post]
