Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 9,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm
At trial, the defense re-asserted its objections to Moline’s opinion on cleavage fragments, but Judge Viscomi permitted Moline to testify about “non-asbestiform cleavage fragments from a medical point of view. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:50 am
Licenses could explicitly be designed to permit reasonable downstream dispositions. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am
McGeveran: true, there’s a range, and of course a range b/t judges applying the doctrine. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Pushing by famous mark owners to get property protection; statute is a compromise/limitation on property rights, and judges have reacted to it that way, being not very friendly to dilution in most cases. [read post]
The Slovak Constitutional Court on Risk Profiling and Automated Decision-Making by the Tax Authority
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am
The law in question includes no mention of such systems or re-use of data and consequently offers no safeguards. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
The judge agreed: that right would prevent transmission or re-transmission in a state to which the Directive applies and other restricted acts would prevent further use of the database within the state of reception. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:47 am
Lack of bona fide intent:Precedential No. 12: TTAB Sustains "HERE'S JOHNNY" Portable Toilets Opposition on Two Grounds: Res Judicata and No Bona Fide IntentNon-Use:TTAB Finds Service Mark Application Void ab initio for Non-Use Because Services Were Not Rendered Prior to FilingRes Judicata:Precedential No. 12: TTAB Sustains "HERE'S JOHNNY" Portable Toilets Opposition on Two Grounds: Res Judicata and No Bona Fide IntentUse in Commerce/Drawing/Specimen… [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am
Fixed scale of costs, £50,000 (that would be a patent case with validity in question; judge wouldn’t expect nearly as much for a copyright or design claim). [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
The judges added that Rule 37 of Regulation 2868/95, which establishes that 'the applicant must provide particulars showing that he is allowed under the applicable national law to lay claim to that right', comprising details on the content of that law (Case C-263/09 P, Edwin v OHIM), is applicable to Article 53(1)(c) CTMR [Do: tell the OHIM which national law your right is based upon, what its content and interpretation is, how your sign qualifies for the protection offered by it; Don't:… [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:13 am
There verticality might potentially make things worse, depending on how people judge the relevance for themselves of consumption levels way above their own. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:51 pm
Also, in Germany the courts break up cases by patent, with design patents not being called patents but "taste patterns" and often being put before different judges anyway.One important quality in patent litigation firms is extremely difficult to research: whether firms give their clients sound advice to settle where it is warranted, or raise false hopes. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
R 0003/15: surprising interpretation of feature violates right to be heardIn R 0003/15 of 28 November 2017 the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal found the right to be heard of the patentee infringed, annulled the Technical Board's decision and sent the case back for re-hearing. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
Ms Avalos’ claims regarded false designation of origin, false endorsement and false advertising. [read post]
[UPCKat] Revisiting lessons from the first ex parte UPC preliminary injunction in myStromer v Revolt
7 Aug 2024, 6:33 am
Although "old" in a the UPC sense, now the dust has slowly begun to settle on the early case law, this decision is well worth a re-visit. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am
Maybe you’re familiar with the Ratemycop.com website. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Checking judges’ work and Beebe on factors: not every multifactor test does balancing for us, and LOC test doesn’t. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court ruled that racism in the application of the death penalty doesn’t matter, we’re finally beginning to have an honest discussion about how we justify legally killing people. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:05 am
Don't eliminate diversion resources because they're underutilized, force judges to use them before revoking people to prison. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:30 pm
Judge Hall noted that the rules were designed for the just, speedy an inexpensive determination of actions. [read post]
