Search for: "In re S. H." Results 4561 - 4580 of 9,910
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2014, 9:42 am by Wells Bennett
Friday evening saw the House’s approval of H. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by K.O. Herston
Seven years later, Father petitioned to change custody, alleging that Mother failed to attend to Child’s medical needs and need for speech therapy. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
By July 2011, the Court had not yet ruled, and the case was re-assigned to another judge. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:17 pm by Patricia Salkin
In re Shane, 117 AD3d 117 (4 Dept 4/11/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Ethics [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
They just don’t buy their artificially cramped understanding of how to figure out what the law is. . . . if you’re trying to make sense of a statute, the question for an interpreter is what Congress meant to communicate by the words that it chose. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:08 am by Emily Williams
If you’re prepared, this will be easier. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 8:48 am
It specifically considers three such battleground campaigns: (1) the conceptualization of the state duty to protect human rights through the framing of national action plans, (2) the operationalization of the corporate responsibility to respect human rights through the framing of societally constituted reporting and assessment programs, and (3) the re-invention of the GP project as an expression of two dimensional internationalized state power and its challenge to the GP’s… [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:23 am by SHG
H/T Gary Hochman Copyright © 2013 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Aidan O'Neill QC
This (re)turn to the common law seems to encourage the creation of a new “mythistory” – to employ the useful coinage of the American historian William H. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
 For example, as was stated in Generics (UK) Limited and others v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12: “National courts may reach different conclusions as to the evaluation of the evidence in the light of the relevant principles, but the principles themselves should be the same, stemming as they do from the EPC. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 4:38 pm by Davina Sashkin
With 1,000,000+ comments now in hand, let’s re-calculate. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 12:44 pm by Michael Lumer
Fun story of the day comes from Kentucky, by way of the Lexington Herald-Leader (with a h/t to Above the Law). [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 2:55 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If the prosecutor felt the court erred in its determination that the substance of the 911 call made by the unidentified caller constituted Brady information, his remedy was to ask for re-argument and not act in a dilatory manner that may yet jeopardize defense counsel's own independent investigation of the Brady witness. [read post]