Search for: "Kennedy v. State" Results 4561 - 4580 of 7,330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2009, 5:29 pm
The oral argument in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Div. 1991) (stating that New York law does not recognize a defamation claim where the plaintiff voluntarily republished the alleged defamatory words); Doe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In his release, Kennedy correctly stated the basic common sense principle that, “Inherent in our nation’s right to religious freedom is a promise that my belief cannot be used to infringe on yours or do you harm. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:32 pm
 The Court spent an hour in Florida v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:53 am by SHG
  It's a 5-4 decision, thus leaving the rights protected by our Constitution in the hands of a single individual, Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose individual views more than any other dictate the fundamental law of the United States of America. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am by Allison Trzop
  Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 12:02 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm by Jeff Gamso
It concerns the respect that federal courts owe the States and the States' procedural rules when reviewing the claims of state prisoners in federal habeas corpus.Coleman's lawyer blew a deadline in the Virginia Supreme Court, and as a result, O'Connor (joined by Rehnquist, White, Scalia, Kennedy, and Souter) determined that Coleman had forfeited his right to have federal courts review his federal constitutional claims. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am by Wolfgang Demino
" Law Research Serv., Inc. v Crook, 36 AD2d 912, 912 (1st Dept 1971)(no long-arm jurisdiction over out-of-state attorney whose only connection to the state is that he hired New York attorney to represent his client in a Texas proceeding).This situation is markedly different from other cases finding jurisdiction based on the engagement of a New York lawyer or law firm by an out-of-state entity. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Richard Re
These cases call to mind Kennedy-era cases like Lujan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm by Adam Feldman
Justice Brett Kavanaugh articulated conservative deference to state law in his concurring opinion in Andino v. [read post]