Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 8,224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
It will also be a major part of Justice Kennedy's legacy. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:12 pm
” State enforced segregation was wrong, but so was state enforced integration in certain spheres of private relations. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:22 pm
Northwest Environmental Defense Center and Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 7:50 am
Kennedy Airport, New York City. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm
The lawsuit, Sevick v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:49 pm
(To the extent that Justice Kennedy deserves his reputation for sensitivity to the views of the states, note that 31 states have signed on to an amicus brief in support of petitioners and of course Oregon is a petitioner.) [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
On November 19, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit considered a case that is at the heart of the cultural struggle over entitlements for religious organizations: Bronx Household of Faith v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:26 am
Ball State Univ. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 6:36 am
" Here's how attorney-blogger Paul Kennedy described the gist of the ruling:In State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:58 pm
"Here is the full opinion:U.S. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
(April 27, 2010) and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:34 am
The case is State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 11:18 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 11:18 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons By Scott Kennedy The U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:06 pm
If the case of Florida v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am
A full Court returned to the question this week in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:33 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
