Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 4561 - 4580 of 21,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2016, 1:00 pm
  And so, as it should have, the defendant won summary judgment on all of the plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 7:25 am by Cardoso Law, PLLC
During the accident, the plaintiff’s vehicle was struck in the rear by a tractor-trailer driven by the defendant. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 4:38 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
  To establish a Maryland negligence action, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant was under a duty to protect the plaintiff from injury, the defendant breached that duty, the plaintiff was injured, and the injury resulted from the defendants breach of duty. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:55 am by INFORRM
Furthermore, Google Spain had no bearing on how English law should approach a contention that a given defendant was liable for breach of Article 8. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:26 am by Jeanne Mageau-Taylor
However, there is still no answer as to whether legislation or the fashion industry’s self-regulation regarding the models’ weight and health are viable ways to deal with this sensitive issue. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 12:33 am by Kevin LaCroix
The defendants allegedly touted the company’s low effective tax rate. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
BrannM.D.Pa.Of note, with respect to those fraternity brothers defendants who were under the age of 21, the court allowed the claims of the plaintiff to proceed against those underaged defendants under the plaintiff’s theory of recovery to hold the defendants liable for breaching an alleged protective duty that the defendants, as fraternity members, allegedly owed to the plaintiff’s son, a fraternity pledge.In this regard,… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
If the DeCaro defendants are found to have also committed malpractice, the Meighan defendants and the DeCaro defendants may both be liable as successive tortfeasors who each contributed to the same injury (see Schauer v Joyce, 54 NY2d 1, 6; Soussis v Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., 66 AD3d 993, 994-995; Khlevner v Tylo, 16 Misc 3d 1129[A]). [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:34 pm by David A. Beatty
” The Court of Claims had granted the defendant summary judgment, holding that the plaintiff could not sue for the snow’s lack of removal since removing the snow was an integral part of his job. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 2:24 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Defendant used Google’s Blogger service to write a post – about plaintiffs’ business practices – that plaintiffs found objectionable. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 2:43 pm
This was an unsuccesful petition by the Insured seeking a declaration that its Insurer had a duty to defend proceedings brought by a third party for damages allegedly sustained as a result of the Insured’s operations. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:54 pm by Luke Rioux
Instead, the court decided to apply a “but-for” causation test:We hold that, at least where use of the drug distributed by the defendant is not an independently sufficient cause of the victim’s death or serious bodily injury, a defendant cannot be liable under the penalty enhancement provision of 21 U. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
(Click on the word "Panama" to "witness the vid" and take a trip back to the 80's). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 10:36 am
Sept. 15, 2009) This is a really interesting legal dispute with an entirely predictable outcome for Facebook as a defendant. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 1:42 pm by Michelle Yeary
  But it applies to design defect as well because a defendant is only liable if the product was defective at the time it was “sold by the manufacturer. [read post]