Search for: "MATTER OF JOHNSON"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 6,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
The Court apparently used the extra relists to formulate an additional question it asked the parties to address, suggested by an ill-fated petition the Court denied earlier this term: “Whether, as a matter of statutory interpretation, conviction of threatening another person … requires proof of the defendant’s subjective intent to threaten. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
On the contrary, this was a premeditated effort to use fraudulent slates of electors to introduce uncertainty and chaos into the Joint Session, no matter what the courts ruled. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
³ Johnson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
A similar bill, Open Access to Courts Act of 2009 (H.R. 4115), was introduced into the House by Representatives John Conyers (D-Mich) and Henry Johnson (D-Ga). [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:22 pm
Harold Koh has taken some important steps forward in that direction; likewise John Brennan and most recently DOD General Counsel Jeh Johnson. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 9:13 am
"The inappropriate … character of a statement is irrelevant to the question whether it deals with a matter of public concern[.] [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Appellate Court ofIllinois – Second District: People v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
Members of Congress seem to have thought it mattered. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
Even the Radical Republicans gave Andrew Johnson time to put on a defense. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Specifically, the court in Caley did not address whether the right to proceed collectively under the FLSA may be waived as a matter of federal law. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
”); Johnson, 2009 U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/826650.opn.pdf In her dissent, Chief Justice Madsen, joined by Justices Charles Johnson, James Johnson, and Fairhurst, argued that the majority treats the “routine process” used for excusing several potential jurors as a critical stage of the trial. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:16 am
“The purpose of a description in the deed is to identify the particular subject matter of the grant, and, if it is possible to ascertain from the description, aided by extrinsic evidence, what property is intended, the conveyance would not be declared void” Glen View Club v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
Regan: In this plurality opinion, Justice Fairhurst, writing for the majority and joined by Justices Madsen, Charles Johnson, Owens and Stephens upheld the revocation of Mr. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am
No matter how deep and persistent the circuit split, no matter how important and recurring the issue, no matter how ideal the vehicle, Ebenezer’s pool-memo recommendation was always the same: “Humbug! [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:10 pm
Virginia and Johnson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
“Nothing outside China matters” … but China cannot succeed except in a globally connected world – and the consequence is that China is burying money in fixed assets that people do not want. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:17 pm
Even at the peak of the effect, people can usually deal with important matters. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm
Johnson, 2017 WL 416128, *9 (E.D. [read post]
