Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 4,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2007, 3:08 am
"Tiger, tiger burning bright hereThe Beast was in court on Tuesday, in the Court of First Instance ruling in Case T-317/05 Kustom Musical Amplification v OHIM. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 4:00 pm
Tucker v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 8:12 am
Thompkins v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
But also in the sense that it deals with topics that are typical staples of legal thinking: he discusses definitions; extensions of logic to a variety of fields, including music, painting, poetry and plays; similarities and differences between copyright infringement and plagiarism; plagiarism in titles; why given examples of plagiarism should or should not be punished heavily or meet with opprobrium. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 6:51 am
This summary of facts from a recent case - United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 10:49 am
The state had a reasonable explanation for the lack of Wiccan religious services. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 8:48 pm
With that thought in mind, I present the second batch of "worst" decisions of 2006.Bose Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 6:16 pm
Hurley Int'l LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
UPC Nederland (Netherlands, District Court of Utrecht)Commentary & discussion:p2pnet.netKeywords: digital copyright online download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 9:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 10:16 am
He said he used www.webcitation.org for the online citations in his amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 4:03 pm
This would imply the adoption of a Community Copyright Regulation to replace the existing directives and partially pre-empt the national laws on copyright of the Member States. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:50 am
In Ross v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:52 am
In California, we had a case called Pacific Gas & Electric Company v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:13 pm
Kahle v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
On the plaintiff's end, the owners of the underlying copyrights in the musical compositions are not involved in the case; neither are many smaller record companies. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
., BMG Music, Capitol Records Inc. and others music companies accuse XM of infringment. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:54 pm
Dennis Crouch summarizes oral arguments for the upcoming KSR v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:25 am
AS AN ASIDE, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE HIGHEST DAMAGE AWARD CASES IN TRADEMARKS TEND TO BE REVERSE CONFUSION CASES, BUT IN THOSE CASES, IT TENDS TO BE DAVID v GOLIATH. [read post]
