Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 119,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
The district court, however, found that remand may be appropriate because plaintiff’s claims appeared to fall within the home state exception to CAFA jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 2:08 pm
Wade, one state may be on the verge of becoming abortion-free. . . . [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 9:28 pm
State that a criminal defendant who spoke Mandarin Chinese, and not English, "may be effectively incompetent to proceed in a criminal matter and rendered effectively absent at trial if... [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:13 am
Washington State Nurses v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:53 am
The decision in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 5:17 am
On Thursday May 15, United States District Court Judge for the Northern District of California, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granted a motion for a preliminary injunction and motion for class certification in Preap v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 8:24 am
Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v.... [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 9:07 am
Sometimes, as in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:36 am
United States v Randazzo, E.D. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:42 am
United States v. [read post]
"Haymond seemingly to become major Apprendi progeny altering federal supervised release revocations"
27 Feb 2019, 2:50 pm
Doug Berman has this post at Sentencing Law & Policy, focusing on the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 1:01 pm
That's because before Marin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
Part V concludes that many other states in Asia already or potentially negotiating treaties with Australia – including Japan and China – are also unlikely to achieve a relaxation of the policy stance. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 6:48 am
Konrath State Legislator Doesn’t Understand That He Works for the Government–Attwood v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm
On 22 May 2015 Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of QRS v Beach. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
McGraw v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:05 pm
No private right of action against “state actors” pursuant to 42 USC 1981, the Civil Rights LawMcGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination.Paul McGovern, a Caucasian male, was employed by the City of Philadelphia. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:09 am
LEXIS 96388, at 14 (citing Forrand v. [read post]
