Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 4561 - 4580 of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
Although the statute did not expressly state this: 14. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am by INFORRM
In Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2008] QB 103 at para 61), the Court considered the impact of “information which is made available to a person’s circle of friends or work colleagues and information which is widely published in a newspaper”. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 6:05 am
Para él, la punición penal no lo es...El aborto que se permite: regulaciones "tipo 3" .En Roe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
Southern Pacific Mortgage Ltd v Heath [2009] EWCA Civ 1135 It has taken me a day or three to get to this one. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
Given the state of the art, it was obvious to anyone who needed a stent of this nature that he would have to use taxol. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Federica Paddeu
And while contextual factors could assist in classifying the measure as a countermeasure (for example, if States meet the requirements of countermeasures), it remains the case that as a default legal views should not be ascribed to States which they have not themselves formulated (Nicaragua, para 266). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:04 pm by V.D.RAO
The relevant portion of the judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Nagpur, in State Bank of India Vs. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:59 am by Joost Pauwelyn
  It may broaden violations (especially in the investment context) by comparing products/investors that do not really compete (in Occidental, exporters of oil v. exporters of flowers) but present the same regulatory concerns. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:31 pm
Second, the child's mother can also file a complaint with the state department of health stating all of the facts. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 1:18 pm
Para finalizar, y entre otros comentarios, se destaca la anotación de la sentencia Af-Cap Inc v Chevron Overseas (Congo) Ltd 475 F.3d 1080 (2007) (9th Cir (US) titulada United States: execution of a judgment against the property of a foreign sovereign under the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
This conclusion – which looks to us to make new law – draws on comments made by the Advocate General in Case C‑119/10 Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH (see para 56) and perhaps on the principles enunciated in transit cases (such as Joined Cases C‑446/09 and C‑495/09), even though this case had nothing to with goods in transit through the EU.Not if there is a risk that the cigerettz will be put on the market in the EU even thoughthey are… [read post]