Search for: "People v. Day"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 23,457
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm
But you are not my people. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:47 am
The Escazú Agreement will enter into force 90 days after the 11th ratification. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:59 am
, Lewis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 6:03 am
(Chambers. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, decided shortly before Bush v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 1:52 pm
For an example of these problems, see U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 11:46 am
NFIB v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:12 am
Today the Supreme Court hears oral argument in California v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
You read all these Senate Bill 1437 opinions these days; it's a fair amount of work for both trial courts and the Courts of Appeal. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
Field v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am
” Kavanaugh cited Marbury v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:33 am
A recent California Supreme Court decision, Ward v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am
Supreme Court gave its judgment in the case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am
Supreme Court gave its judgment in the case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:06 am
Chief Justice Rehnquist discussed these two heads of authority in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court in Brownback v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those… [read post]
