Search for: "People v. Herring"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 23,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am
Her dissent drew deeply from originalist theory and sources similar to Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 2:09 pm
In People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 2:09 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:13 am
The Eleventh Circuit’s en banc decision in Adams v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 9:30 am
In a recent case, Bryan Bank & Trust v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:31 am
As the population is aging and people are working much later in life, the problem will only get worse if things do not change. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
Stanley v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:13 am
The California Supreme Court today in a much-anticipated decision, People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:42 am
In the recently decided case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 1:35 pm
On the heels of my last post about a “hopelessly ambiguous” jury verdict comes a decision requiring reversal because the proceedings left the parties and trial court so “throughly confused” that the defendant was deprived of his right to counsel: People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:36 am
In three cases consolidated under the lead case of People v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 7:26 am
Some people really do not like being told to get a flu shot and, in Latner v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 11:12 am
After the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:51 am
Here's her report — at the NPR website — on yesterday's oral argument in a case she doesn't mention the name of but which I happen to know is Schuette v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:30 am
Recently, a Florida appellate court evaluated this situation in Byrne v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:14 pm
A current case that foreshadows this is the decision in Garcia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am
That a simplified version of the P&I Clause but the point is that it ensures "the citizens of the United States [are] one people, by placing the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States," even if people in those other states elect someone that we despise to the White House.The case is Clement v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:51 pm
For most people, they are family members. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:12 am
The last decade's racial discrimination in subprime lending—discrimination that the ACLU is challenging in Adkins v. [read post]
