Search for: "People v. Polite"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 13,782
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2018, 4:36 pm
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for a plurality in Hamdi v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:31 pm
The exemption of home health care workers from labor rights laws was the subject of Evelyn Coke’s bitterly contested Supreme Court case, Long Island Care at Home v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
" But the logic of the disturbing-the-peace theory could also apply to any speech that people find offensive enough to threaten a fight over, including political or religious speech that doesn't include personal insults—for instance, sharp criticisms of Islam at an Arab International Festival, which led to audience members "throwing plastic bottles and other debris. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:57 am
We haven’t seen courts treat the strict scrutiny test in RFRA laws very seriously in the past, which is why we’ve avoided the “anarchy” Justice Scalia warned about in Employment Div. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 7:58 am
As a matter of constitutional interpretation, Hoke v U.S., 227 U.S. 308 (1913) seemed to suggest that Congress had the power to block movement of people across state lines for any purpose whatsoever. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:04 pm
From Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:58 am
There were four big takeaways for me from this session: --The Google v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:01 am
" Brinsdon v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am
Filed under: Case comments, Education, In the news, Politics / Public Order, Protocol 2 Art. 1 | Right to education, Spending cuts [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am
In Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17 FLR 141, 267, for example, Blackburn J said: The evidence shows a subtle and elaborate system highly adapted to the country in which the people led their lives, which provided a stable order of society and was remarkably free from the vagaries of personal whim or influence. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
Texas, which effectively made all gay people criminals in the eyes of the law. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 8:23 am
-Silver v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:04 pm
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 5:36 am
Daniel Solove: People are writing about their private lives (and others' private lives) - the blogosphere is mostly personal, only a smaller part political. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
They are literally the only people whose opinions genuinely count in his version of the law. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
As Lord Mansfield said in 1769, in the case of R. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm
Article 1, § 1 of Michigan’s Constitution states that “[a]ll political power is inherent in the people. [read post]
