Search for: "Plaintiffs Lead Counsel"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 6,141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
The operating agreements for the Companies were substantially the same, and each provided for monthly distributions to the plaintiff based on monthly profits. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
The two cases leading to the Second Circuit’s decision are discussed below. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 8:26 am
Plaintiffs were not trying to raise constitutional claims to reverse the state court’s child custody decisions – they were seeking damages for due process claims, including “restriction of access to the courts and denial of adequate legal counsel. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
This case is a classic example of how failing to engage in measured negotiation can lead to awful consequences for a plaintiff – even when they have a strong case! [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:40 am
The Board hired outside counsel (the Latham & Watkins firm) which investigated and concluded that the activity was taking place as the employee reported. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
This case is a classic example of how failing to engage in measured negotiation can lead to awful consequences for a plaintiff – even when they have a strong case! [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
The court, counsel and parties should be aware that no matter how difficult the circumstances may be, the litigants’ interests are not the primary concern. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am
Fear of copyright liability, for example, predictably leads platforms to remove parodies and home videos. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:25 am
So the government defendants could preempt much of discovery, at least for now (in the face of the crowing of plaintiffs' counsel and PR team in both cases about how they are going to wade hard into discovery) and at least as to the constitutional claims by seeking immediate review as to the legal issue of clearly established. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:30 pm
So the government defendants could preempt much of discovery, at least for now (in the face of the crowing of plaintiffs' counsel and PR team in both cases about how they are going to wade hard into discovery) and at least as to the constitutional claims by seeking immediate review as to the legal issue of clearly established. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:07 pm
And if it is, what types of affirmative duties do insurers have where the carrier is uncertain as to whether a conflict exists or believes that the insured is already protected through the advice of its own counsel. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm
By contrast in Morgan, the plaintiff/petitioner claims that the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
The ultimate goal of initiating a SLAPP lawsuit is not necessarily a judgement in favour of the plaintiff. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:43 pm
As the plaintiff which initiated the action, AF knew at the outset that a bond might be required. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
[Page 1:] The plaintiffs, Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP, Great Hill Investors LLC, Fremont Holdco, Inc., and Bluesnap, Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Did defense counsel tell the judge about the changes? [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm
It did so through amendments providing that lead agencies must identify the real parties in interest who must be named in any CEQA action in their filed NODs. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
Project Denials The lead agency is not required to complete an EIR in order to deny a project. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 10:56 pm
Also, where a derivative plaintiff can credibly allege such a breach, pre-suit demand on the board is excused. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:57 am
He also was lead trial counsel with his partner, a former FBI agent and former prosecutor, representing sex offenders who successfully challenged Nebraska’s idiotic and blatantly unconstitutional restrictions on the use of the Internet by such offenders. [read post]
