Search for: "Quick v. State" Results 4561 - 4580 of 4,771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 4:36 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Before Real Party was able to complete a response to this issue, Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye interrupted, inquiring as to the impact of the Court’s previous decision in Industrial Welfare Com. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:00 am by Michael Scutt
It stands at the centre of the bosses v workers, capital v labour, rich v poor divide and is frequently pressed into service by those who have a political agenda on one side or the other. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am by Cyberleagle
The Ministers are Oliver Dowden MP (Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport); Caroline Dinenage MP (Minister for Digital and Culture) and Baroness Williams (Lords Minister, Home Office). [read post]
But while lots of people are quick to hammer home that COVID-19 is not the seasonal flu (which, by the way is estimated to have killed 61,000 Americans virtually without mention in 2017-18), it is certainly not the Spanish flu either. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm by Mayela Celis
This Ibero-American Convention conceives videoconferencing as a resource that enhances and expedites cooperation between the competent authorities of the signatory States. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am by familoo
Right, so taking a quick look once on the off chance might be ok - but checking back multiple times and joining the dots. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 7:30 pm
On July 2, 1976, in deciding the case of Gregg v Georgia, the Supreme Court legalised capital punishment after a decade-long moratorium on executions. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am by Adam White
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 11:34 am by Jonathan Bailey
What it Means This lawsuit is following a similar trajectory to the Lenz v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:37 pm by Jason Greis
Accordingly, HHS proposes to amend the Privacy Rule to permit covered entities to disclose proof of immunization to schools in states with such school entry laws upon oral agreement from the parent, guardian, or other perso [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 8:37 am by Pamela Pengelley
Copyright Act   In the United States, the concept of fair use has now been set out in section 107 of the Copyright Act (Title 17 of the United States Code). [read post]