Search for: "S. Sherman" Results 4561 - 4580 of 5,995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2010, 7:49 pm
A few weeks ago she was swimming through her flat after a neighbor's pipe burst (flood). [read post]
28 May 2010, 10:42 am by Ruth Levor
But the conduct at issue in this case is still concerted activity under the Sherman Act that is subject to §1 analysis. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:20 am by admin
The National Football League’s licensing of its teams’ logos and trademarks constitutes concerted action that is not categorically beyond Section 1 Sherman Act liability, and the legality of such concerted action must be evaluated under the rule of reason, according to a unanimous decision by the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:23 am
Bd. of Regents (1984-2 Trade Cases ¶66,139), agreements among sports teams about whether and how they will participate in the marketplace are subject to scrutiny under the Sherman Act, Section 1. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:38 pm by William H. Holmes
Mitsubishi’s claims are brought pursuant to Section 2 of the Sherman Act, Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, and a state law claim of tortious interference with contractual and prospective business relationships.MPSA engages in the development, manufacture, and distribution of variable speed wind turbines and related components. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:58 pm by LRC Bloggers
But the conduct at issue in this case is still concerted activity under the Sherman Act that is subject to §1 analysis. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:52 pm
Monday the Supreme Court unanimously held the NFL's practice of collectively licensing the trademarks of all 32 individual teams is not immune from antitrust scrutiny under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:32 am by war
Contrast the (interlocutory) outcome in Sherman, where the Commissioner wished to fight on. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:38 am by Antitrust Today
  And a federal merchants’ putative class action in New York claims that Visa’s and MasterCard’s interchange fees result from price-fixing in violation of Section One of the Sherman Act. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm by Erin Miller
 At this blog, Lyle Denniston concludes that although “the American Needle case always had the potential to produce a significant new statement from the Court on the Sherman Act’s application . . . in the end it did not. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:13 pm by Randy Picker
The NFL wanted a uniform, national rule that would treat the NFL as single entity for the purposes of Sherman Act Section 1. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:46 pm by Lyle Denniston
The National Football League’s owners had won a major exemption from Sherman Act liability in the Seventh Circuit Court for themselves and for the owners in other pro leagues. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:11 pm
Nat'l Football League, No. 08–661 In an antitrust action challenging the NFL's grant to Reebok of an exclusive license to create apparel incorporating the NFL's intellectual property, the Seventh Circuit's affirmance of summary judgment for defendants is reversed where the alleged conduct related to licensing of intellectual property constituted concerted action that was not categorically beyond the coverage of Section 1 of the Sherman… [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:47 pm
The Supreme Court held that the NFL's "alleged conduct related to licensing of IP constitutes concerted action that is not categorically beyond section 1's [of the Sherman Act's] coverage" and that the NFL does not constitute a single entity for the purposes of the Sherman Act. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:57 am by Marc Edelman
Today the Supreme Court agreed, ruling 9-0 to overturn the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in American Needle v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:46 am by Erin Miller
Holding: The NFL’s team joint licensing of the use of trademarks on clothing and other consumer goods may be challenged under the Sherman Antitrust Act’s section 1. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
  The particular activity at issue, though, is “concerted activity” of the kind that is subject to challenge under the Sherman Act’s Section 1, the Court concluded. [read post]
23 May 2010, 6:14 pm
"Elena Kagan's writings suggest judge's proper role": Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report. [read post]