Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 4,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 6:34 am
Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, stated that Stone was not the original source of the information that resulted in Rockwell International, now part of aerospace giant Boeing Co., being ordered to pay the government nearly 4.2 million for fraud connected with environmental cleanup at the Rocky Flats plant. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:05 am
United States, No. 05-1272. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
The United States was founded on a contradiction: all men are created equal; our Constitution enshrines slavery. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
Millett, Assistant to the Solicitor General, argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae in support of respondent. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
United States, a 1943 case in which the Court overturned a defendant's conviction because a U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
Want to amaze your friends with your ability to predict the outcome of cases argued in the United States Supreme Court? [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
As United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
[L]ast term Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a separate opinion in a death-penalty case for the sole purpose of excoriating Justice David Souter, who had written in a dissent about exonerated innocents. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 7:59 am
" Well, Scalia got that right. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 5:25 am
*In Phillip Morris v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:33 pm
Perhaps Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:23 pm
So far, lower courts have disagreed with him, most recently in State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
On Tuesday, the Court heard argument in Winkelman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 8:01 am
Ainsa, Jr. of El Paso, Texas, arguing for petitioner, began by appealing to the Court's prior decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
(For a post-United Foods version of this problem, see Eric Goldman's post on Langdon v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 5:37 am
United States, U.S., No. 04-1034 (2006). [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:59 pm
Olson then turned to his main argument, saying that Microsoft did not supply components from the United States because the software actually installed on the computers was copied overseas. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
