Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 155,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2010, 4:40 pm
Green (University of Mississippi - School of Law) has posted Substantive Due Process after McDonald v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what the Court said in Buckley v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:58 pm
Type “United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:31 pm
The recent case of Wissa v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2014] EWHC 1518 (QB)) is an important reminder that, when pleading a defamation claim, it is necessary to set out the precise text of the words complained of and that it is not sufficient to simply state where they can be found e.g. on a particular URL. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Shep Melnick, is "The Administrative State in Action: Lessons from Title IX. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:09 pm
Case Notes William Garske, Alleged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in The Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v Colombia), Judgment Emily Leggett, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v Myanmar), Preliminary Objections Connor Wright, The Liability of States for Inadequate Climate Action under International Human Rights Law - Billy v Australia [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 5:14 am
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTIONUnited States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
This is because you have to know quite a bit about both federal law and constitutional law to understand it. [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 5:14 pm
Gair In Gasques v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 4:14 am
The Law.com article is: Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Whether Search Was Proper After Arrest That Violates State Law [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:46 am
Given this fact, we thought we'd point out to our readers the recent Ninth Circuit decision in Rosa v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:17 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:17 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The legislature repealed Civil Rights Law §50-a [see Chapter 96, Laws of 2020] and made several related amendments to the State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], providing that such changes "shall take effect immediately". [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The legislature repealed Civil Rights Law §50-a [see Chapter 96, Laws of 2020] and made several related amendments to the State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], providing that such changes "shall take effect immediately". [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am
Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Kennedy, and by Justice Scalia in all except Parts III and V–B–1.To discuss the case, we have Kristen Osenga, who is a Professor of Law at the University of Richmond School of Law. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am
Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Kennedy, and by Justice Scalia in all except Parts III and V–B–1.To discuss the case, we have Kristen Osenga, who is a Professor of Law at the University of Richmond School of Law. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
However, the ruling doesn't mean that former spouses automatically are entitled to a portion of their ex's military retirement pay, and each case is decided according to individual facts and state law. [read post]