Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 76,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2020, 3:30 am
The questions for the Supreme Court were firstly whether it is unlawful for the Secretary of State to exercise his power to provide MLA so as to supply evidence to a foreign state that will facilitate the imposition of the death penalty in that state on the individual and secondly whether it is lawful under the Data Protection Act 2018, Part 3 for law enforcement authorities in the UK to transfer personal data to law enforcement authorities abroad for… [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:45 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:57 am
Applying the test established in Critical Mass Energy Project v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am
“Doe met each man in person and was sexually assaulted and raped. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:46 am
Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited opinion in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2025, 2:53 am
Recent High Court decisions in fact held it was defamatory to allege that a person expressed homophobic views or engaged in homophobic behaviour (Alam v Guardian News [2023] EWHC 2847 (KB); Paisley v Linehan [2024] EWHC 1976 (KB)). [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:53 pm
" While most businesses operating in Florida owe their customers such a duty, the ruling of the state District Court of Appeal for the First District in Hinley v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
In HIRA Educational Services North America v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:34 am
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Whitlow v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 9:45 am
The first inference is that the “country” governing licenses executed by North Americans must be the United States because Maryland is part of the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:33 am
In Personalized User Model LLP v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:16 pm
Lenahan’s constitutional rights had not been violated because individuals do not have personal entitlement to police enforcement of a protective order. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
See Miller v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:09 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
