Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 4,766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
Consumer Prod. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Two articles on the settlement in arbitration Readers may also note this very lengthy post in Kluwer Arbitration Blog by Gary B Born & Claudio Salas on the US Supreme Court's decision AT & T v Concepcion (2011). [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Tom Umberg, D-Santa Ana, wrote a letter to bar leaders on Dec. 7 warning that “any proposal that would materially change current consumer protections for clients receiving legal services and fundamentally alter the sacrosanct principles of the attorney-client relationship would be heavily scrutinized by our committees. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Tom Umberg, D-Santa Ana, wrote a letter to bar leaders on Dec. 7 warning that “any proposal that would materially change current consumer protections for clients receiving legal services and fundamentally alter the sacrosanct principles of the attorney-client relationship would be heavily scrutinized by our committees. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:36 am
” It cites Basic Inc v Levinson (1988) for the proposition that “information is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision or if the information would significantly alter the total mix of information made available. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
Bank as the back-up Special Servicer for the Trusts. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am
[FN3: Alcoholic beverages may be consumed, but at the personal expense of the consumer.] [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
But don’t depend upon the “bencher mentality” to protect lawyers’ markets. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
Suppose a manufacturer knowingly sells a product with a defect that could potentially harm consumers and fails to recall the product or warn the public about the defect. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
Suppose a manufacturer knowingly sells a product with a defect that could potentially harm consumers and fails to recall the product or warn the public about the defect. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
In the face of recent financial upheavals, Cuba is seeking to liberalize its approach to economic organization, but in a way that would retain a state monopoly of the use of the corporate form while opening a small and well-managed consumer oriented private sector. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
The head of the Panamanian law firm, Mossack Fonseca, which specializes in setting up offshore companies, denied any wrongdoing, and said his firm has fallen victim to “an international campaign against privacy. [read post]
