Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 7,749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm
The claimant also demonstrated that the dismissal of the indictment, at the request of the People, was based, in part, on newly-discovered medical evidence based on CPL 440.10 [1] [g]. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 12:13 pm
Many people found this bizarre and offensive. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Affirming the Third Department’s holding, the Court of Appeals held that “this case is not akin to Guzman where the prospective juror confirmed that a sign language interpreter would allow him to follow the proceedings verbatim,” since in Guay, no alternative accommodations were requested or discussed (People v Guay, 18 NY3d 16, 23 [2011]).Along these lines, the Fourth Department noted that “[i]t is well established that ‘[a] juror who has not… [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:37 pm
Scorpio Music S.A. et al v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
Dean v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:01 pm
The only people it could have “looked bad” for would be members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 4:09 pm
It was established in Wilson v Covington, People v Perron and People v Eason that a criminal defendant may seek such relief at any time after the entry of judgment. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 1:03 am
Indeed, as we know from Midland Heart v Richardson [2008] L. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 1:03 am
Indeed, as we know from Midland Heart v Richardson [2008] L. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:10 am
Supreme Court case of Miranda v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:44 am
As I pointed out to the Court of Appeal in Grant v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court case of Miranda v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:55 pm
., Florida Star v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version).We have been unpacking what might at first appear to be a rather straightforward inquiry: "what is law?" [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
Two differently constituted Courts of Appeal for England and Wales, within a very short period, appear to have come up with quite different approaches to how to treat an appeal in which they take issue with the trial judge's findings of fact, one case being Lumos and the other being Okotoks v Fine & Country (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 5:46 pm
If you’re interested in reading the details, check out this PDF hosted on the TGD Law website: Hayes v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
In this environment, people have to think carefully before making decisions that might affect their own financial futures. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
I've "heard of" guys who'd easily go through that in one sitting. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:46 am
On Tuesday, a Ninth Circuit panel heard oral arguments in a case brought by television broadcasters against internet retransmission service FilmOn X (née Aereokiller). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:32 am
At trial the jury heard testimony from both Mr. [read post]
