Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 13,835
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 am
The United States Supreme Court, too, has recognized the pivotal role of state tort actions “as a complementary form of drug regulation” with respect to drug labeling. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:55 am
” In a recent case, Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:17 pm
In its brief, United Policyholders stated that the D&O insurer’s “interpretation of the subject exclusion renders paid-for coverage illusory. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 11:24 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:11 pm
Edwin Kneedler, deputy solicitor general, argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm
Byrd v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, and Cyan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm
In contrast to the Tree Top Court’s unwillingness to infer an implied demand, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, in Scottsdale Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 10:57 am
Facts: This case (Fitzgerald et al v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:00 am
Sept. 28, 2017), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted XOMA Corp. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm
In 1996, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in Daniel J. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:24 pm
“[United States v.] [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:20 am
His ADA retaliation claim also failed (Rodrigo v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
Naccarato (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 17-CV-24682-JLK), the SEC alleged that in September 2013, California-based attorney Owen H. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
United States, in which the justices will consider next week whether a driver has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a rental car when he is not listed as an authorized driver on the rental contract. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:59 am
v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am
While the order concluded that the summons satisfied a “legitimate purpose” and (mostly) sought “information relevant to that purpose” under the Powell test (United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 6:54 am
Last month, a judge in the United States District Court of the Southern District Of California said the authors of “Oh, The Places You’ll Boldly Go” couldn’t prove that the concept of “fair use” protected them from a lawsuit from the Seuss estate seeking damages. [read post]
