Search for: "Victory v. State"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 6,924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2013, 2:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
Cal.): Order re: Motion for Summary Judgment (Public Redacted Version) This here is a legal victory that should put all of that U.S. antitrust litigation from the late 2010s to rest (short of a successful appeal, but chances are so slim that I guess an appeal will not even be brought). [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 7:59 am
Parks, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:17 pm
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:26 pm
The first of which is Moen Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:02 pm
Competition was fierce, but "FUCT" ultimately proved to be a suitably victorious namesake: this year's 1st place winner was none other than "F.U.C.T. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:27 pm
Washington State start-up NautiGirl received a trade mark cancellation notice from global lifestyle apparel house Nautica and its parent, VF Corp. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 10:01 pm
The decision, Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:59 am
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
As explained recently by the Supreme Court in eBay v. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 5:50 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:10 pm
In Pompasi v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:08 pm
In Kirby v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
Cook v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 7:36 am
In the end, however, they came on board, along with several state governments. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:29 pm
For additional background on the Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:56 am
Original Article 05/20/2010 By Wendy Kaminer In what will likely be one of her last victories as solicitor general, Elena Kagan persuaded the Supreme Court to embrace an expansive vision of federal power that should agitate right-wing advocates of freedom and small central government, but probably won't, because U.S v Comstock, involved the power to detain people deemed "sexually dangerous" under the popular Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Here is the legal section:In "Lying" about sexual orientation in a rape trial posted at Polymorphous Perversity, we get a discussion about a Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals ruling that a defendant on trial for rape had no right to introduce testimony relating to the alleged victim's sexual orientation.In A Supreme Court Victory For School Sexual Harassment Cases posted at Gender & Sexuality Law Blog, we get a discussion of the results of Fitzgerald v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 7:04 am
Financial System Contributed to Afghanistan’s Collapse by Timor Sharan (@TimorSharan) BRICS Summit BRICS Summitry: What Takeaways for the United States? [read post]
