Search for: "Williams v. United States" Results 4561 - 4580 of 6,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am by Randy Beck, John Langford
” Based on the historical pedigree of qui tam statutes in England and the United States, the Supreme Court upheld qui tam informers’ standing in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
  In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
  In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 2:09 pm by Robert Black
Currently, federal law charges the Archivist of the United States with certifying that an amendment has been validly adopted. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
With that said, the book provides insights relevant to analyzing the Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by JB
: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020).May 27, 2020Balkinization Symposium on Timothy William Waters, Boxing Pandora: Rethinking Borders, States, and Secession in a Democratic World (Yale University Press, 2020) and F. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:00 am by Guest Author
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926), after centuries in which a profoundly different understanding of the doctrine was prominent. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
[Brayshaw] now brings this action against Defendants City of Tallahassee and State Attorney William Meggs challenging the constitutionality of Section 843.17. . . . [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:02 pm by Dan Flynn
United States) giving prosecutors “broad latitude” to present evidence in a criminal trial. [read post]