Search for: "York v York" Results 4561 - 4580 of 52,973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Matter of Rosa v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 02538 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Matter of Rosa v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 02538 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:46 am
Today, the United States Court of Appeals in New York City ruled against the Republic of Argentina in the matter NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:30 am by PaulKostro
., A New York Corporation, TEXTILE RECOVERY SERVICES INC., a New Jersey Corporation, ISLAND TEXTILE, INC., a New York Corporation, and VENTURE LEASING, a New York Corporation v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:00 pm
In today’s New York Times, Linda Greenhouse offers this article on yesterday’s 6-to-3 decision in No. 07-474, Engquist v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Coller v State Univ. of NY., 80 A.D.2d 166, the Appellate Division considered a claim that certain participants in the State University of New York's Optional Retirement Program* [ORP] were exempt from the provisions of Chapter 890 of the Laws of 1976, which Chapter, in pertinent part, created "a new retirement program for public employees hired on or after July 1, 1976. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Coller v State Univ. of NY., 80 A.D.2d 166, the Appellate Division considered a claim that certain participants in the State University of New York's Optional Retirement Program* [ORP] were exempt from the provisions of Chapter 890 of the Laws of 1976, which Chapter, in pertinent part, created "a new retirement program for public employees hired on or after July 1, 1976. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
York had based its fair dealing guidelines on a model prepared by the the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada following the decision of the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:21 am
In light of this decision, the Second Circuit, in Thyroff v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:49 am by Stephen Bilkis
Establishing paternity in New York is an important legal issue that can have significant consequences for both the child and the parents involved. [read post]