Search for: "1-10 Jane Does" Results 441 - 460 of 534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 11:40 am by froomkin@law.tm
What implications does this have for laws, regulations, customs, and management? [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
  The House version of the bill costs $8 billion over ten years, but does not yet have sufficient offsets. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:39 pm
Now a few thoughts: 1) Yes, I get that this is a non-starter politically. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
BELL From January 2007 to June 2007, Jane Doe worked for an answering service in Temecula. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:01 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Few crimes affect all of society in the way that treason does. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
This cost underestimates the true cost as it does not include the cost of weather delays on airline customers, e.g., from lost productivity, wages, etc. 1 Since June 2003, carriers that account for at least 1 percent of domestic scheduled passenger revenues have reported the cause for both flight cancellations and/or delays in the categories of weather, carrier, national airspace system (NAS), and security. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 4:13 pm by Jeralyn
And make no mistake: the biggest disaster would be the election of Republican Ken Buck or Jane Norton in November. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
DOE This case concerns the termination of parental rights of Jane Doe III (Doe). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
Jane or John Doe a/k/a “Beautiful Dreamer,” and/or “Confused,” “Fatboy” et al. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
The first seven counts involved allegations of sexual assault against Jane Doe I, a.k.a. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:30 pm by Keith Bruno
Jane Doe #3Between Sept. 1, 2005, and Nov. 10, 2005, Wagner pulled over Jane Doe #3, an undocumented Spanish speaking woman, on four occasions while on-duty in a marked patrol car. [read post]
9 May 2010, 10:00 am by INFORRM
  In relation to Article 10 she concluded that it “does not apply to create a presumptive right for any person to film the proceedings” [67]. [read post]