Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2009, 8:20 am
Among other items the Republican bill would amend the Clean Air Act to overturn Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:29 pm
Ace Ventura, Pet Detective. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cardinal Vaughan Memorial School, R (on the application of) v The Archbishop of Westminster & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 433 (14 April 2011) H and L v A City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 403 (14 April 2011) Marcroft v Heartland (Midlands) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 438 (14 April 2011) Desai v National Car Parks Services (NCP) [2011] EWCA Civ 402 (14 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Deeney, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 893 (14… [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Rehberg v Paulk, 566 US at 370 n 1). [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The Defendant was therefore found to have invited an inference of bad reputation derived from other damaging publications, contrary to the rule in Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:36 pm
It is Seasons Style Number AC 15-0065. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:32 am
The Court of Appeals has upheld the verdict.The case is Southerland v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 1:56 pm
The current elevated risk draws into focus the recent decision in Merck and International Indemnity v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am
Judgment In this judgment, after setting out the background Tugendhat J considered submissions made as to his statement in his earlier judgment that “trial with a jury will generally be ordered as a matter of discretion, in particular where the state, or a public authority, is a defendant” [35] He accepted that, in the light of cases such as H v Ministry of Defence ([1991] QB 103) and Racz v Home Office ([1994] 2 AC 45) he should have omitted the… [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:06 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:55 pm
The proposed tort bears close comparison to the UK’s misuse of private information action, developed from Campbell v MGN ([2004] AC 457). [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
Motherwell v Motherwell ((1976) 73 DLR (3d) 62) and Wainwright v Home Office ([2004] 2 AC 406) expressly contemplated nuisance’s application to privacy. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am
At the ACS Blog, Jeffrey Mandell discusses an amicus brief filed on behalf of the District of Columbia by the state of Wisconsin, joined by 23 other states, that “attempts to constitutionalize the dispute, with broad implications. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:47 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
The principle espoused by Lord Bingham in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323 should not mean that the domestic courts are bound to a course of inaction. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
By way of introduction, Lord Brown noted that the majority in the House of Lords in Secretary of State for the Home Department v JJ [2008] 1 AC 385 held that deprivation of liberty might take a variety of forms other than classic detention in prison or strict arrest. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
It will be interesting to see how much of the upcoming Supreme Court argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
