Search for: "ADAM M. SMITH" Results 441 - 460 of 795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2011, 2:05 pm by AdamSmith1776
I mentioned it in a recent piece here on Adam Smith, Esq., but now I want to discuss how it does, or doesn't, apply to the classic law firm model. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:02 am by Robert Oszakiewski
Adam Smith (D-WA-9th) - the ranking member of either a House or Senate Committee or Subcommittee is usually the most senior member of the minority party in the House or Senate - has raised objections to H.R. 1540, specifically citing Sec. 1647 as violating the House Republican's recently adopted ban on earmarks: May 26, 2011 Dear Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith: I write today to express concerns about the process used in your committee's… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:11 pm by Tom Smith
I'm no theologian, but I believe Adam would have tried to have sex with the snake. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:00 am by Derrick Dominguez
” Unlike most other industries where brands can be entirely (and profitably) built around single players (think sports or music), Adam Smith advocates for law firms to build brands around their firm in its totality. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:19 am by David Oscar Markus
David; Hedrick, Charles V.; Lever Jr., Chauncey W.; Adams, Christi; Griffin, Christopher L.; Kise, Christopher M.; Creely, Curt P.; Bachrach, Daniel (Dan); Zenov, Darin I.; Cook, David C.; Woodson, R Duke; Baxa Jr., Edmund T.; Lotzia, Emerson M.; Magee, Emily; Cerezo, Francisco J.; Ridley, Fred S.; Davis, Gardner F.; Koch, Gary D.; Fernandez-Quincoces, Guillermo J.; Raij, Irwin P.; Arkin, J. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am by royblack
Last week I discussed how documentaries teach us to use different types of media to keep the jury’s attention. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:15 am by Jordan Furlong
And he’d be further daunted by the following considerations: This week, Bruce MacEwen at Adam Smith Esq. wrote about the difficulty of “branding” a law firm: “Law firm partners are anything but designed or acculturated to delivering a ‘consistent experience’ or ‘a particular quality level. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:51 am by Keith Lee
And perhaps young lawyers will have a new avenue for being placed with law firms if Adam Smith, Esq. has its way about it. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Smith, The tax-exempt status of the NCAA: has the IRS fumbled the ball? [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:59 pm by Joshua Wright
   Karl Smith makes a similar point here. [read post]