Search for: "APPLICATION OF SMITH"
Results 441 - 460
of 7,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, invited job seekers to apply for a position as assistant to Union's executive assistant and indicated that the successful applicant "would ultimately work for Ms. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:59 pm
The Court also reaffirmed its holdings in earlier-decided cases that applying the IPR portion of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act to patents arising from applications filed before enactment of the AIA is not unconstitutional. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 9:11 pm
John Bird of Sughrue Mion PLLC; Christopher Scharff of McAndrews, Held & Malloy; and Neil Smith of Schwegman Lundberg and Woessner LLP will offer a discussion for patent prosecuting and litigating attorneys and patent agents on the best practices and strategies for patent application preparation and prosecution, as well as a review of recent developments in PTAB proceedings. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 6:21 pm
The Application of the Substantive Public Policy Exception in Polish Annulment Proceedings Gordon Smith, Comparative Analysis of Joinder and Consolidation Provisions Under Leading Arbitral Rules Bas van Zelst, Class Actions and Arbitration: Alternative Approaches Based on the (Ever Evolving) Dutch Experiences with Collective Redress Florencia Villaggi, Recent Developments in the Arbitration Legislation in Argentina Oleg Skvortsov & Leonid Kropotov, Arbitration Changes in… [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 8:46 am
The argument was that the family exception in the statute for assisting spouse, child, or parent in being smuggled takes it out of strict categorical application. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 1:06 am
The Herbert Smith Freehills post on this topic can be accessed from here. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm
Smith & Nephew, and the impact these have had on AIA Trial Proceedings. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:51 pm
Teva Pharmaceuticals that its patents were invalid by application of the on-sale bar under 35 U.S.C. 102(b). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:47 am
In Smith v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:59 pm
Patent and Trademark Office determinations mandated that disgruntled patentees and patent applicants show that factual decisions by the Office are not supported by substantial evidence in order... [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:41 pm
Smith, FedSmith , Apr. 9, 2018The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been the focus of investigations and concern regarding the possibility of employees there attempting to thwart new policies of the Trump administration.Information has been released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to a law firm— the “Cause of Action Institute”.The organization has recently released an update on the results of the investigation regarding EPA employees and… [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 9:30 am
First, the Louisiana Supreme Court on November 4, 2020 denied the Louisiana Department of Revenue’s writ application in Smith International, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 9:30 am
First, the Louisiana Supreme Court on November 4, 2020 denied the Louisiana Department of Revenue’s writ application in Smith International, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
Now that the gTLD list has been released, find out what steps you should take to help you protect your brand by reading Reed Smith's most recent client alert. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:11 am
Data controllers include landlords as they will have details of their tenants and any applicants they considered. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:11 am
Data controllers include landlords as they will have details of their tenants and any applicants they considered. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:01 am
For more information regarding this Bill and its effects on employer hiring practices, please contact your Reed Smith attorney. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:32 am
But the case also shows that there need not be a blind application of this rule to the specific case you may have at hand. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:25 pm
The application was eventually dismissed and the reasons provided by… David Smith: I think it was Justice Pattillo right? [read post]
