Search for: "Adam Feldman"
Results 441 - 460
of 815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman identifies “[s]everal possible facets of the justices’ new oral argument strategies [that] became apparent during the first week of oral arguments for the 2017 Supreme Court term. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman cites the experience of the oral advocates and amici in the cases on the October argument docket as evidence that “the justices are taking on a set of potentially more contentious cases with far reaching political implications” after having considered a “non-divisive set of cases during the 2016 term. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 4:05 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at the petitions the justice considered at this week’s “long conference” “that will in all likelihood at least minimally garner serious review” because they “either have an associated amicus brief, at least one elite attorney, or both. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 2:23 pm
"Petitions to Watch For From SCOTUS' Long Conference": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 2:00 pm
The panel that I will be moderating on the morning of Saturday, November 4, 2017 features Adam Feldman of the "Empirical SCOTUS" blog, law professor Richard L. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the Supreme Court litigation record of top-tier law firms. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:48 pm
" Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:50 pm
Bruhl and Adam Feldman have posted this paper on SSRN. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:08 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at the government’s slate of merits and amicus cases for the upcoming Supreme Court term, as well as its pending cert petitions, noting that the “intensity in the OSG’s Supreme Court docket” demonstrates “the political importance of the Supreme Court in the current administration of federal policies. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 8:08 am
"A Primer on The Government's Participation Before the Supreme Court at the Start of the 2017 Term": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 6:03 pm
"Law Schools, Judges, and Government Attorneys": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 4:34 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes the federal government’s Supreme Court litigation over the past several terms, concluding that the office of the solicitor general “has not been the paragon of success before the Court that it is and was often assumed to be. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
"The Court's Lack of Recent Support for the Federal Government's Agenda": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:55 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at citations by lower courts to cases from the past term and notes that many of the most-cited cases involve criminal law and procedure. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 6:22 pm
"The Court's Most Cited Decisions of 2016": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines new data from this past term concerning the size of the majority across different types of cases, the length of time between oral argument and when the justices release their opinions, and differences in the justices’ voting relationships with one another. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:02 pm
"Crunching Data From this Past Term": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:12 pm
[Law Practice Today] * Adam Feldman looks at which lower-court judges see their dissents most often vindicated at the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the effect of lower-court dissents on Supreme Court case grants and outcomes, focusing on whether “some judges’ dissents are given more weight than others. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:50 pm
"Loud Voices From Below": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
